Legal Opinion

Chalet Susse International, Inc. v. Mobil Oil Corp.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided October 18, 1991PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GLASSMAN, Justice.

The defendants, Mobil Oil Corporation (Mobil), Sohio Oil Company (Sohio), and B.P. Oil, Inc. (B.P.), 1 appeal from a summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff, Chalet Susse, Inc. (Chalet Susse), entered in the Superior Court (Cumberland County, Alexander, J), on the enforcement of a deed restriction. We disagree with Mobil’s contention that the deed restriction, limiting Mobil’s use of the property to the "[sjale of gasoline, oil products, automotive accessories, and the service of automobiles,” is unenforceable and affirm the judgment.

In 1971, Chalet Susse purchased…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Palmer v. ChamberlinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1951
  2. Roberts v. Maine Bonding & Casualty Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
  3. Interstate Industrial Uniform Rental Service, Inc. v. Couri Pontiac, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1976
  4. Roy v. BolducSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1943
  5. Lord v. LordSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Pottle v. Up-Right, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993
  2. Beale v. ChisholmSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993
  3. Hutz v. AldenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2011
  4. Smith v. VoisineSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
  5. OFFICEMAX INC. v. SousaDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API