Legal Opinion

Martineau v. Mehlberg

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 1936PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFritz, J.

The principal facts upon which the plaintiff seeks to recover herein from the defendant Mehlberg and the Guaranty Company, as surety on his bond as administrator of Samuel McKee’s estate, for Mehlberg’s failure to account for $5,000 of the assets of that estate, were stated in the opinion filed herein on a former appeal, and reported in Jones v. United States F. & G. Co. 214 Wis. 629, 254 N. W. 95. Substantially the same facts were established on the trial which resulted in the judgment now under consideration. That judgment was ordered by the court after a trial upon which it was established…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Dantzler Lumber & Export Co. v. Columbia Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1934
  2. American Bonding Co. v. National Mechanics BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1903
  3. Martens v. ReillyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  4. American Nat. Bank v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  5. McLennan v. ChurchWisconsin Supreme Court · 1916

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Maryland Casualty Co. v. GoughOhio Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Hodgins v. National Surety Corp.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API