Legal Opinion

Hodgins v. National Surety Corp.

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided November 19, 1941No. Civil Action No. 519Published

1Opinion of the Court

DUFFY, District Judge.

The matter now before the court is the separate motions of the defendant National *882Surety Corporation and of the defendant James Sorenson to dismiss on the ground that the amended complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.

For the purpose of these motions, the following facts must be accepted as true. The plaintiffs are respectively the successor trustees of the segregated trust of the Citizens State Bank of Gillett, Wisconsin, the Banking Commission of Wisconsin, and the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Oconto County, Wisconsin. The individual…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Rowell v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Crook v. First National Bank of BarabooWisconsin Supreme Court · 1892
  3. National Surety Co. v. State Savings BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
  4. Carroll v. FethersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Richfield Nat. Bank of Richfield v. American Surety Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API