Legal Opinion
Maryland Casualty Co. v. Gough
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided March 13, 1946No. 30384 and 30400PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
Maryland, in its appeal (No. 30384), complains that the trial court erred in giving American’s special request to charge before argument, in its charge after argument, and in failing to charge thé jury before argument propositions of law requested by Maryland in writing.
Gough, in his appeal (No. 30400), asserts that the trial court correctly charged on the issues and complains that the Court of Appeals erred in’reversing the judgment in his favor on the ground that the charge of the trial court was erroneous.
The amended petition alleges that Gough alone was responsible for the misapplication…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- American Surety Co. v. Bethlehem National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Dantzler Lumber & Export Co. v. Columbia Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1934
- American Bonding Co. v. National Mechanics BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1903
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Union Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1915
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Frederick Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1944
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Travelers Indemnity Co. v. TrowbridgeOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- PIE Mutual Insurance v. Ohio Insurance Guaranty Ass'nOhio Supreme Court · 1993
- ABN AMRO Mortgage Group, Inc. v. KangahOhio Supreme Court · 2010
- Williams v. Ashland Chemical Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1976
- Swiss Reinsurance America Corp. v. Roetzel & AndressOhio Court of Appeals · 2005
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.