Legal Opinion

McBride v. Grand de Tour Plow Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the Southern District of Iowa

Decided October 18, 1889PublishedCited by 5 opinions

In Equity. Bill for infringement of patent.

1Opinion of the CourtSniRAS, J.

The first question for determination in this cause is that of jurisdiction over the (3rand de Tour Row Company, a corporation created under the laws of the state of Illinois. The company appeared in the cause, filed an answer to the merits, has taken testimony, and now, upon the final hearing, not by a plea to the jurisdiction, but by a mere suggestion of counsel, seeks to question the jurisdiction of the court upon the theory that it cannot be sued in a district other than that of its r-esidence. Counsel cites authorities in support of the well-recognized principle that consent of parties…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rodgers v. PittU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada · 1899
  2. Smith v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kansas · 1894
  3. Lewis Blind Stitch Co. v. Arbetter Felling Mach. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois · 1910
  4. Union Switch & Signal Co. v. Hall Signal Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1895
  5. McBride v. KingmanU.S. Circuit Court for the Southern District of Iowa · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API