McBride v. Kingman
U.S. Circuit Court for the Southern District of Iowa
These were four patent infringement suits, brought by J. H. McBride against the following defendants, respectively: Kingman & Co., R. l\L Galbraith, and the Weir Plow Company; H. H. Sickles and Deere & Co.; James Ainsworth, John S. Bonbright, and the Moline Plow Company; and George W. Randall, Adam Dickey, and the Norwegian Plow Company.
1Opinion of the Court
WOOLSON, District Judge.
The four cases above entitled were heard together. Plaintiff, McBride, bases his several actions upon two patents for improved riding attachment to plow, issued to him as patentee, viz. No. 199,082, dated January 8, 1878, and No. 284,038, dated August 28, 1883. These patents are hereinafter referred to as plaintiff’s 1878 and 1883 patents, respectively. Plaintiff asks decree for damages for infringements thereof, and for permanent injunction against each defendant. The defendants in each case, while denVing infringement of plaintiff’s patents, set np therein the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- McClain v. OrtmayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Miller v. Eagle Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
- White v. DunbarSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Railway Co. v. SaylesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Deering v. Winona Harvester WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Fulton Co. v. Powers Regulator Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1920
- McBride v. KingmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1899
- Victor Talking Mach. Co. v. American Graphophone Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1907