Legal Opinion
City of Los Angeles v. Animal Defense League
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 9, 2006No. B177908PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PERLUSS, P. J.
The City of Los Angeles on behalf of two of its employees, Sharon Morris, then interim general manager of the City’s animal services department, and David Diliberto, director of field operations for the *610department, filed three petitions under Code of Civil Procedure section 527.81 seeking workplace violence protective orders against animal rights activist Pamelyn Ferdin Vlasak (Ferdin)2 and the Animal Defense League—Los Angeles (ADL-LA) following a raucous nighttime protest at Diliberto’s home. The trial court granted temporary restraining orders against Ferdin and ADL-LA…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Navellier v. SlettenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- Ketchum v. MosesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- Equilon Enterprises v. Consumer Cause, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002
- City of Cotati v. CashmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- Jarrow Formulas, Inc. v. LaMarcheCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Flatley v. MauroCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- Greater Los Angeles Agency on Deafness, Inc. v. Cable News Network, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Paiva v. NicholsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Graffiti Protective Coatings, Inc. v. City of Pico RiveraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Doubt v. Activision Publishing, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2011
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.