Legal Opinion

Krooner v. City of Waterbury

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided January 28, 1927PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, J.

This is an appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment in favor of the defendant in an action wherein the plaintiff sought to recover damages for an injury suffered by a fall upon a sidewalk in the defendant city. The complaint alleges that the sidewalk was defective and unsafe for public travel “by reason of the covers of the water and gas mains which are set in” it, and, in a separate paragraph, that it was “also defective and unsafe for public travel for and by reason of an accumulation of ice and snow” upon it. On the trial and before us the complaint has been treated as stating two causes of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Frechette v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
  2. Fine v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1918
  3. Perry v. HaritosSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
  4. Carl v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1919
  5. Wladyka. v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1922

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Willoughby v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
  2. Marino v. Town of East HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
  3. Stevens v. NeligonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
  4. Flynn v. First National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
  5. Woodward v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API