Legal Opinion
Meas v. City and County of San Francisco
District Court, N.D. California
Decided February 9, 2010No. C 08-4075 PJHPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY
PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON, District Judge.
Defendants’ motion for partial summary judgment came on for hearing before this court on January 20, 2010. Plaintiff appeared by his counsel Ben Nisenbaum, and defendants appeared by their counsel Scott Weiner. Having read the parties’ papers and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, and good cause appearing, the court hereby GRANTS the motion as follows.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Jonathan Meas filed this action on August 26, 2008, alleging claims of constitutional violations,…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Sweat v. ButlerDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2015
- Sexton v. KENTON COUNTY DETENTION CENTERDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2010
- Murphy v. City of TulsaDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2018
- (PC) Williams v. GamboaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
- (Willie) Johnson v. AyersDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.