Wood v. Brunswick Pulp & Paper Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Hall, Judge.
The Supreme Court of Georgia recently emphasized that the “trial of all issues of fact by a jury was not intended to be abrogated by the summary judgment statute. . . The summary judgment is a vital provision to accomplish its worthy and obvious objective, to avoid frivolous delays in judgment, but it carefully preserves the province of a jury to decide issues of fact.” Ginn v. Morgan, 225 Ga. 192, 194 (167 SE2d 393).
The case law of Georgia as expressed by this court is in keeping with this mandate: “On motion for summary judgment, the movant has the burden of showing the absence…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Holland v. Sanfax CorporationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
- Ginn v. MorganSupreme Court of Georgia · 1969
- Colonial Stores, Inc. v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
- Raven v. Dodd's Auto Sales & Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
- Brown v. KellySupreme Court of Georgia · 1890
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Wakefield v. AR Winter Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
- Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Woolfolk Chemical Works, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
- Slater v. Canal Wood Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
- Simmons v. Classic City Beverages, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- Merritt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.