United Fire & Casualty Co. v. Bruggeman
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FORSBERG, Judge.
A landlord’s insurer brought a subro-gation action against negligent tenants who caused fire damages. The trial court determined the tenants were co-insureds under the policy and therefore not amenable to suit. We affirm.
FACTS
Respondents Jerry and Carla Bruggeman rented space from the Jedneak Brothers Properties in July 1990. There was no written lease or contract between the parties, and no independent arrangement for provision of insurance coverage was discussed. On August 6, 1990, a fire destroyed the property. The Jedneak Brothers were paid $81,-275 by their…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Sutton v. JondahlCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1975
- Neubauer v. HostetterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1992
- Fire Insurance Exchange v. GeekieAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
3Cited by34 opinions
- Union Mutual Fire Insurance v. JoergSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
- Ram Mutual Insurance Co. v. RohdeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- Rausch v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- GNS PARTNERSHIP v. FullmerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1994
- Tri-Par Investments, L.L.C. v. SousaNebraska Supreme Court · 2004
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.