Legal Opinion
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Ramthun
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided September 30, 2015No. 2014AP2476-DPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Per curiam
¶ 1. We review Referee Dennis J. Flynn's recommendation that we suspend Attorney Phillip J. Ramthun's license to practice law for a period of two years and six months for professional misconduct. Neither the Office of Lawyer Regulation (OLR) nor Attorney Ramthun has appealed the referee's recommendation. Therefore, the matter is submitted to the court for review pursuant to Supreme Court Rule (SCR) 22.17(2).1
¶ 2. In conducting our review, we will affirm the referee's findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Inglimo, 2007 WI 126, ¶ 5, 305…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against WiduleWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
- Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against InglimoWisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
- Disciplinary Proceedings Against TullyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Patrick M. CooperWisconsin Supreme Court · 2013
- Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against AliaWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Matthew S. MacLeanWisconsin Supreme Court · 2016
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Rostollan (In Re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Daniel J. Rostollan)Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2018