Legal Opinion
Watson v. D/S A/S Idaho
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided June 1, 1973No. Civ. A. 71-1821PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
CLIFFORD SCOTT GREEN, District Judge.
Presently before the Court is defendant’s motion for summary judgment filed pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. “It is . . . well settled that a motion for summary judgment does not present a trial of issues but is for the purpose of determining whether there are any genuine issues as to material facts, and that it must clearly appear on such a motion that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact if the motion is to be granted.” Janek v. Celebrezze, 336 F.2d 828, 834 (3rd Cir. 1964). Viewing the record before us,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Seas Shipping Co. v. SierackiSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Executive Jet Aviation, Inc. v. City of ClevelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Healy v. RattaSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Gutierrez v. Waterman Steamship Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Victory Carriers, Inc. v. LawSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Givens v. Prudential-Grace Lines, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
- Kinchloe v. Aero Commander, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
- Embry v. Hibbard Inshore, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2019