Legal Opinion

Kinchloe v. Aero Commander, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 12, 1974No. Civ. A. No. 73-689PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

SNYDER, District Judge.

Before the Court for determination is a Motion for Summary Judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure No. 56 filed by the Defendants, Rockwell International, Inc. (Rockwell) and Aero Com*33mander, Inc. (Aero). After oral argument, briefs and a review of the applicable law, it is concluded that the Motion must be granted.

DEFENDANT ROCKWELL

This diversity action for wrongful death arises from the crash of an Aero Commander 690 during a training flight in the vicinity of Wellsburg, West Virginia on August 14, 1972. Plaintiff’s Decedent was the co-pilot of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Griffith v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  5. Auten v. AutenNew York Court of Appeals · 1954

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kinchloe v. Aero Commander, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API