People's Savings & Trust Co. v. Rayl
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
BRINCK, Commissioner.
In an action to foreclose a mortgage upon real estate, the mortgagors, Robert Rayl and Nora Rayl, were made parties defendant; and under an allegation that one W. R. Brooks claimed an interest in the mortgaged premises, which interest was alleged to be subject and subsequent to plaintiff’s lien, said Brooks was also made a party defendant. Defendant Brooks was served with summons but did not appear and suffered default. The defendants Rayl answered the complaint, and filed a cross-complaint against plaintiff to which Brooks was not made a party, and which was answered by…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Nelson Bennett Co. v. Twin Falls Land & Water Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1907
- Buffendeau v. EdmondsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- Garrett v. GarrettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
- Sutter County v. TisdaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Boob v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Mendini v. MilnerIdaho Supreme Court · 1929
- Bothwell v. KeeferIdaho Supreme Court · 1933
- Isaak v. JourneyIdaho Supreme Court · 1932
- State v. StokesIdaho Supreme Court · 1934
- Fisher v. BylundUtah Supreme Court · 1939
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.