Legal Opinion

Myers v. Myers

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 3, 1967No. 455PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.

“The statute (G.S. 50-16) provides two remedies, one for alimony without divorce, and another for subsistence and counsel fees pending trial and final disposition of the issues involved.” Deal v. Deal, 259 N.C. 489, 131 S.E. 2d 24; Richardson v. Richardson, 268 N.C. 538, 540, 151 S.E. 2d 12, 13, and cases cited.

“The remedy thus established for the subsistence of the wife pending the trial and final determination of the issues involved and for her counsel fees is intended to enable her to maintain herself according to her station in life and to have sufficient funds to employ adequate counsel…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Davis v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. Fogartie v. FogartieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  3. Deal v. DealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  4. Creech v. CreechSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  5. Richardson v. RichardsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. McDowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  2. Schloss v. SchlossSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. Sprinkle v. SprinkleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  4. Brady v. BradySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  5. Newsome v. NewsomeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API