Legal Opinion

State v. McDowell

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 10, 1984No. 195A82PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EXUM, Justice.

The question dispositive of this case is whether Judge Collier entered the order allowing defendant’s motion for appropriate relief without applying the appropriate constitutional standard. Believing that he did, as the state contends, we vacate his order and remand the case to the superior court for a hearing de novo.

I

The movant, Robert Henry McDowell, was convicted of first degree murder and felonious assault at the 3 December 1979 Criminal Session of Johnston Superior Court, Judge Smith presiding. After a sentencing hearing, the jury recommended that a sentence of death be…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. Mooney v. HolohanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. State v. ArtisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  2. Whitacre Partnership v. Biosignia, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  3. North Carolina Department of Environment & Natural Resources v. CarrollSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  4. State v. RobbinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  5. State v. ErazoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API