Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Multnomah County

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1861PublishedCited by 27 opinions

Error to Multnomah County. The statement of the ease is sufficiently made in the opinion of tbe Court.

1Opinion of the CourtStratton, J.

This cause was argued at the July Term, 1861, of this Court, and the Court expressing an opinion which in effect decided the matter in controversy, but which was not touched by the counsel for the plaintiff in error, an application was made for a further hearing. The motion was allowed and the cause continued. At_ this term the matter was again more fully considered upon the written argument of the plaintiffs’ counsel. From the record, it appears that James Johns, and others, at the April Term of the County Court of Multnomah County, petitioned for the laying out. and opening a road on the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rice v. ParkmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1820
  2. Kilham v. WardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1806
  3. Niblo v. Post's administratorsNew York Supreme Court · 1840

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Strawberry Hill 4 Wheelers v. Board of CommissionersOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Parker v. Fort Worth & Denver City Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Comrs. of Mason v. GriffinIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
  4. School District Number Two v. LambertOregon Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Kinsloe v. PogueIllinois Supreme Court · 1904

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API