Legal Opinion
Carroll v. Getty Oil Co.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided August 27, 1980No. Civ. A. 79-268PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
LATCHUM, Chief Judge.
This action, based on diversity of citizenship, 1 was brought by plaintiffs, Thomas Carroll and his wife Grace, against Getty Oil Company, Getty Marketing and Refining Company, and Getty Oil Company (Eastern Operations), Inc. The plaintiffs seek compensatory and punitive damages for personal injuries suffered by Mr. Carroll while he was operating a Milton Form Rolling Machine (“MFRM”) owned by Getty Marketing and Refining Company (“Getty”) which was located at Getty’s refinery at Delaware City, Delaware. Plaintiffs have moved for partial summary judgment…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Viola O. Tomalewski v. State Farm Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
- United States of America Ex Rel. Burwell L. Jones v. Alfred T. Rundle, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
- Henry Janek v. Anthony J. Celebrezze, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1964
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Duphily v. Delaware Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1995
- Brady v. Ralph M. Parsons Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
- Figgs v. Bellevue Holding Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1994
- Tydings v. LoewensteinSupreme Court of Delaware · 1986
- United States v. BachmanDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1985
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.