Legal Opinion
Francis v. City of Bowling Green
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
Decided May 21, 1935PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Stanley, Commissioner
Affirming.
The city of Bowling Green has caused a sewer system to be built under the revenue-bond plan authorized by section 27411-1 et seq. of the Statutes, as amended by chapter 109, Acts 1932. The basic ordinance divided the city into seven districts, provided for the construction and the issuance and amortization of forty-year bonds in the amount of $630,000. The ordinance' further provides that charges and rates shall be collected from those served by the sewers sufficient to satisfy the bonds and maintain the system. A later ordinance,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- City of Bowling Green v. KirbyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
- Nourse v. City of RussellvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935
- Wheeler v. B. of Com'rs. City of HopkinsvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
- Hopkins County v. St. Bernard Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1902
- Williams v. City of RacelandCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Louisville & Jefferson County Metropolitan Sewer Dist. v. Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1948
- Rash v. Louisville & Jefferson County Metropolitan Sewer DistrictCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1949
- Utah Power & Light Co. v. Ogden CityUtah Supreme Court · 1938
- MacMahon v. BaumhauerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- Sanitation Dist. No. 1 of Jefferson County v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1952
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.