Williams v. City of Raceland
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
Judge Thomas —
Affirming in part and Reversing in part.
This is a declaratory judgment proceeding brought by appellant and plaintiff below, W. H. Williams, against the appellees- and defendants below, the city of Raceland and some of its officers, to test the validity of a proposal by the city to construct, maintain, and operate a system of waterworks within the city, and to issue bonds to obtain the necessary funds therefor, pursuant to the provisions of chapter 133 of the Acts of 1926, as amended by chapter 92 of the Acts of 1930. The first one of them authorized cities…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Beard v. City of HopkinsvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1894
- Neutzel v. RyansCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
- Fox v. Boyle County Et Al.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
- Barnett v. CaldwellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
- Kirksey v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1894
3Cited by17 opinions
- State and Diver v. City of MiamiSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
- Spahn v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937
- Wheeler v. B. of Com'rs. City of HopkinsvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
- Eagle v. City of CorbinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
- Utah Power & Light Co. v. Ogden CityUtah Supreme Court · 1938
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.