Legal Opinion
Ditz v. Myriad Constructions, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 16, 2000No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Although Supreme Court properly granted the motion of defendant B. Milligan Contracting, Inc. (Milligan) for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against it (appeal No. 1), the court erred in granting summary judgment to defendant Myriad Constructions, Inc. (Myriad) pursuant to CPLR 3212 (b) and dismissing the complaint against it (appeal No. 2). Plaintiff, an employee of third-party defendant General Electric Company (GE), commenced this action to recover damages for injuries that he sustained when he stepped in a hole in the raised…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Rizzuto v. L.A. Wenger Contracting Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1998
- Russin v. Louis N. Picciano & SonNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Crawford v. MarcelloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Bratton v. J.L.G. Industries, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Gaggiano v. SinickiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bax v. Allstate Health Care, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Roosa v. Cornell Real Property Servicing, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Waszak v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Ditz v. Myriad Constructions, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Reisch v. Amadori Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000