Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Smythe

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided January 6, 1987PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFine, J.

A jury of six in a District Court convicted the defendant of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor and of failing to stay within marked lanes. The Commonwealth’s case consisted of testimony from the arresting officer about the events, the results of a breath test administered on a device known as the “Intoxilyzer 5000” revealing a blood alcohol content of .17 percent weight by volume, and a videotape taken of the defendant while he was being booked and while the breath test was being administered. The defendant attempted unsuccessfully to have the judge…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. California v. TrombettaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Commonwealth v. RussMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
  3. Commonwealth v. BoydMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  4. State v. VegaOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Lauderdale v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1976

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DiGeronimoMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1995
  2. State v. LowtherHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Commonwealth v. CamblinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2015
  4. Commonwealth v. MooreMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1987
  5. Commonwealth v. PaganoMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API