Legal Opinion

Berkowitz v. Kass

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 10, 1945No. Appeal, 58PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Allen M. Stearns,

The question presented by this appeal is whether the court below abused its discretion in refusing to open a judgment. Upon the termination of a written lease, appellee entered judgment by confession against appellant for possession of real estate in Philadelphia. Appellant filed a petition for a rule to open judgment, alleging that the parties had entered into a subsequent oral lease. Appellee’s answer denied the allegation; thereafter depositions were taken. On consideration of the depositions the court in banc discharged the rule, stating that it “. .…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Upsal Street Realty Co. v. RubinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Kelber v. Pittsb. N. Plow Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County1892
  3. Augustine v. WolfSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  4. Schuy'l T. Co. v. Sobolewski Et Ux.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  5. Quaker City Chocolate & Confectionery Co. v. Warnock Building Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Lombardo v. Gasparini Excavating Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  2. Lened Homes, Inc. v. Philadelphia Department of Licenses & InspectionsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  3. Spilove v. Cross Transportation, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  4. American Express Co. v. BurgisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Vallish v. RapoportSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API