Legal Opinion

Wiggins v. North Carolina Department of Human Resources

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 4, 1992No. 918SC52PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

As his first assignment of error, respondent contends the trial court erred in concluding the findings of fact did not support the Commission’s conclusion that petitioner was dismissed for just cause. We find no merit to this assignment.

A reviewing court may modify or reverse the agency’s decision if the substantial rights of the petitioner may have been prejudiced because the agency’s findings, inferences, conclusions, or decisions are:(4) Affected by other error of law;(5) Unsupported by substantial evidence. . . in view of the entire record as submitted; or(6) Arbitrary or…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Thompson v. Wake County Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  2. Walker v. North Carolina Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  3. Brooks v. Rebarco, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  4. Matter of KozyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  5. Reed v. ByrdCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Amanini v. N.C. Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  2. In re the Appeal by McCraryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  3. Sun Suites Holdings, LLC v. Board of AldermenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  4. Cape Medical Transport, Inc. v. North Carolina Department of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  5. Hopkins v. Nash CountyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API