Legal Opinion

Indiana Michigan Power Co. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided June 27, 2003No. 98-486CPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

HODGES, Judge.

Congress authorized the Department of Energy to draft a contract establishing procedures for removing Spent Nuclear Fuel from Indiana Michigan’s property beginning January 31, 1998. Indiana Michigan paid fees and assessments to the Government for this service based on its production of electrical power before and after 1983. The Department of Energy did not remove plaintiffs Spent Nuclear Fuel in 1998, and it has not done so to this day.1

The parties’ agreement does not contain an express rate or schedule for collecting nuclear waste from plaintiffs premises.…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. Bowen v. Georgetown University HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. United States v. Winstar Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. McAbee Construction, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Boston Edison Co. v. StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  2. Southern Nuclear Operating Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  3. Tennessee Valley Authority v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
  4. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  5. Indiana Michigan Power Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API