Southern Railway Co. v. Allen
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Deen, Judge.
Code § 38-406 states: “The admissions by an agent or attorney in fact, during the existence, and in pursuance of his agency, shall be admissible against the principal.” Code § 4-315 states: “The agent shall be a competent witness either for or against his principal. His interest shall go to his credit. The declarations of the agent as to the business transacted by him shall not be admissible against his principal, unless they were a part of the negotiation, and constituting the res gestae, or else the agent is dead.” The Code sections must be construed together, and the second…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Krogg v. Atlanta & West Point RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
- Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Americus Construction Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1909
- Johnson v. RooksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
- Fluker v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
- Bazemore v. MacDougald Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1969
- Stouffer Corp. v. HenkelCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
- Brooks v. Kroger CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
- Hassell v. FIRST NAT. BANK OF NEWTON CTYCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
- A Child's World, Inc. v. LaneCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.