Legal Opinion

Kling v. National Candy Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1920No. Docket No. 18PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Certiorari to Industrial Accident Board. Arthur R. Kling presented his claim for compensation against the National Candy Company for injuries received in defendant’s employ. From an order denying a petition for a discontinuance of payments under an award, defendant and the iEtna Life Insurance Company, insurer, bring certiorari.

1Opinion of the CourtBrooke, J.

Certiorari to the industrial accident *160board. The plaintiff, at that time a young man of 17 who had completed his third year in high school, was employed during vacation on August 7, 1917, by the defendant and set to work running a lozenge mixer. This machine was about 5 feet long, 3 feet wide and 18 to 20 inches deep and its base stood about 2 feet from the floor. On the inside of this trough-like box two spiral screws about 10 inches in diameter revolved slowly (20 to 22 revolutions per minute) in opposite directions. Into this receptacle several hundred pounds of sugar, a certain quantity…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Foley v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Jameson v. Walter S. Newhall Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Miller v. S. Fair & SonsMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Leitz v. Labadie Ice Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1920

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sington v. Chrysler CorporationMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Webber v. Dort Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Sington v. Chrysler CorporationMichigan Supreme Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API