Legal Opinion

Leitz v. Labadie Ice Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 1920No. Docket No. 14PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Certiorari to Industrial Accident Board. Carl Leitz presented his claim for compensation against the Labadie Ice Company for injuries received in' defendant’s employ. From an order denying a petition for the discontinuance of payments under an award, defendant and the Standard Accident Insurance Company, insurer, bring certiorari.

1Opinion of the CourtSteere, J.

Defendants by writ of certiorari seek review and reversal of an order of the State industrial accident board refusing their petition to be relieved from further weekly payments to plaintiff under a previous order of said board. The record discloses that plaintiff Leitz suffered an accidental injury on February 2, 1917, while in the defendant ice company’s employ and having been, by appropriate proceedings under the workmen’s compensation law, ad*567judged then totally disabled, was awarded $6.78 per week. This was paid him from February 2, 1917, until December 19,1919, at which time defendants…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Foley v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Jameson v. Walter S. Newhall Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Miller v. S. Fair & SonsMichigan Supreme Court · 1919

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Congoleum Nairn, Inc. v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1930
  2. Medacco v. Campbell, Wyant & Cannon Foundry Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  3. Haske v. Transport Leasing, Inc., IndianaMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Geis v. Packard Motor Car Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Leitz v. Labadie Ice Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1924

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API