Sign Innovation v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Judge LEAVITT.
Ron Ayers (Claimant) and Sign Innovation (Employer) each petition for review of the adjudication of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) that affirmed the Workers’ Compensation Judge’s (WCJ) dismissal of Employer’s modification petition but reversed the WCJ’s award of unreasonable contest attorney’s fees. In this appeal, we consider whether an employer may seek a modification of disability benefits under the Workers’ Compensation Act (Act) 1 even though an impairment rating evaluation (IRE) reveals that the claimant is 50 percent impaired. We also consider…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- City of Philadelphia v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Lewis v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Landmark Constructors, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Costello)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Weismantle v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Schachter v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Whitfield v. Workers' Comp. Appeal Bd.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Diehl v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Westmoreland Regional Hospital v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Barrett v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Diehl v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.