Legal Opinion

United States v. Ahtanum Irrigation District

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 10, 1956No. 14714_1PublishedCited by 88 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPE, Circuit Judge.

This is a suit brought by the United States as trustee for the Yakima tribe of Indians to establish and quiet title to the Indians’ right to the use of the waters of Ahtanum Creek in the State of Washington, which right is alleged to have been reserved by the treaty of June 9, 1855 between the United States and the Confederated Tribes of Yakima Indians.1 This was the treaty by which the Yakima Indian reservation was set aside for the Indians. The defendants in the main are the non-Indian owners of lands outside the reservation who had appropriated or claimed rights to the…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Utah Power & Light Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. United States v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Winters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  4. Lone Wolf v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  5. United States v. WinansSupreme Court of the United States · 1905

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by88 opinions

  1. Countyof Oneida v. Oneida Indian Nation of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. United States v. WashingtonDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1974
  3. United States v. City of Tacoma, WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  4. United States v. AdairCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  5. Narragansett Tribe of Indians v. Southern Rhode Island Land Development Corp.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1976

83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API