Legal Opinion

United States v. Walker River Irr. Dist.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 5, 1939No. 8779PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEALY, Circuit Judge.

The United States brought suit to restrain the appropriators of the waters of the Walker River and its tributaries from interfering with the natural flow of the stream, to the extent of 150 cubic feet per second, to and upon the Walker River Indian Reservation in Nevada. The Bill prayed that the plaintiff be adjudged to have a prior right to that quantity of water, that the relative rights in the stream be adjudicated, and that a water master be appointed to carry the decree into effect. After extended hearings before a special master, the court made findings and entered…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. United States v. KagamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Utah Power & Light Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  3. Wilcox v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
  4. Winters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  5. Lone Wolf v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1903

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. United States v. WashingtonDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1974
  2. United States of America, and Lummi Indian Tribe, Intervenor-Appellant v. State of WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  3. United States v. AdairCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  4. United States v. Ahtanum Irrigation DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
  5. Healing v. JonesDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1962

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API