Legal Opinion

Dahle v. Atlantic Richfield Co.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided September 26, 1986No. S-315PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RABINOWITZ, Chief Justice.

OPINION

Kenneth and Betty Dahle brought an action for damages against Atlantic Rich-field Company (ARCO) after Kenneth Dahle was injured in an industrial accident. In their complaint, the Dahles alleged that Kenneth Dahle’s injuries were proximately caused by ARCO’s negligence. ARCO denied liability and a jury returned a special verdict in favor of ARCO, finding that ARCO owed no duty of care to Kenneth Dahle. Following the superior court’s denial of their motion for a new trial and entry of a final judgment, the Dahles appealed.

I. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS BELOW

Kenneth…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Ferrell v. BaxterAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Jeter v. St. Regis Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  3. Moloso v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Adoption of v. M. C.Alaska Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Ahlstrom v. CummingsAlaska Supreme Court · 1964

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Ware v. WareAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Keen v. RuddyAlaska Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Patrick v. Lynden Transport, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Abeita v. Northern Rio Arriba Electric CooperativeNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Martinson v. Arco Alaska, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API