Legal Opinion

Mahnke v. Freer

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 7, 1901PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Wayne; Hosmer, J. Case by Max Mahnke against Edgar A. Freer, Richard H. Phillips, and Jacob E. Goldberg for injuries caused by a collision on the highway. From a judgment for defendants, plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

This action is brought to recover damages for injuries sustained by the plaintiff in being run over by the defendants while they were driving on the Boulevard in Detroit, the plaintiff at the time .riding his bicycle on said Boulevard. The first count of the declaration charges that:

‘ ‘At about half-past 7 in the evening, when it was quite dark, said plaintiff was traveling on a bicycle in an easterly direction on the south track of the Boulevard in said city of Detroit, and when at or near the point where the said Boulevard intersects Second street, in said city, said defendants and one…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Schindler v. Milwaukee, Lake Shore & Western Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Bouwmeester v. Grand Rapids & Indiana RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Abel v. Eli Lilly & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Benson v. RossMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  3. McCoy v. DeLiefdeMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Gaufin v. ValindMichigan Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API