Legal Opinion
Appliances, Inc. v. Queen Stove Works, Inc.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided February 25, 1949No. 34,765PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Knutson, Justice.
Plaintiffs, Appliances, Inc., and The Cincinnati Oil Works Company, are corporations organized under the laws of Ohio. Appliances, Inc., is wholly owned by and is a subsidiary of the parent corporation, The Cincinnati Oil Works Company. The Cincinnati company is involved in this litigation only for the reason that the credit of Appliances, Inc., had not been established, and it was necessary to use the credit rating of the parent corporation in order to do business. Inasmuch as the interests of the two are coextensive, we shall refer to both corporations jointly as plaintiff.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Goebel v. HoughSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1879
- Paine v. SherwoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1875
- Johnson v. WrightSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
- Force v. GottwaldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
- Greenhut Cloak Co. v. OreckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Cardinal Consulting Co. v. Circo Resorts, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Bemidji Sales Barn, Inc. v. ChatfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Frank Sullivan Company v. Midwest Sheet Metal WorksCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1964
- Barbarossa & Sons, Inc. v. Iten Chevrolet, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Koenig v. LudoweseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.