Legal Opinion
Welsh v. Takekawa Iron Works Co., Ltd.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided April 4, 1995No. C0-94-1918PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
529 N.W.2d 471 (1995)
Neil V. WELSH, Respondent,
v.
TAKEKAWA IRON WORKS CO., LTD., Appellant,
v.
EVANS ROTORK, INC., et al., Defendants.
No. C0-94-1918.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota.
April 4, 1995.
James R. Bettenburg, Dennis K. Kispert, Bettenburg Law Firm, St. Paul, for respondent.
Steven J. Muth, Louise A. Behrendt, Stich, Angell, Kreidler & Muth, Minneapolis, for appellant.
Lawrence R. King, Daniel J. Trudeau, King & Hatch, P.A., St. Paul, for defendants.
Considered and decided by NORTON, P.J., SCHUMACHER and MANSUR,[*] JJ.
OPINION
MARTIN J. MANSUR, Judge.
Appellant, a Japanese corporation, argues the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Barone v. Rich Bros. Interstate Display Fireworks Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- Hardrives, Inc. v. City of LaCrosse, Wis.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Marquette National Bank of Minneapolis v. NorrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re Lupron Marketing and Sales Practices LitigationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2003
- Gray v. Lewis & Clark Expeditions, Inc.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1998
- KSTP-FM, LLC v. Specialized Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
- Butler v. JLA Industrial Equipment, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
- Juelich v. Yamazaki Mazak Optonics Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.