Legal Opinion

Mary Schaller and Waldemar T. Schaller v. Capital Transit Company, a Corporation

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided November 29, 1956No. 13438PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

The female plaintiff (appellant) sued to recover for personal injuries allegedly sustained while alighting from one of defendant’s (appellee’s) buses, and her husband joined in the action to recover for loss of consortium and for medical expenses. The evidence on the part of the plaintiffs disclosed that, after ringing the bell to stop the bus, Mrs. Schaller moved forward from her seat in the rear to the center door for the purpose of alighting. As she made her way through the crowd of passengers (who were “packed in there”), she called out, “Please, let me out.” As she reached the top of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Washington & Georgetown Railroad v. Harmon's AdministratorSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Betty Basham v. City Bus Company, a Delaware Corporation and John Doe, Whose Real Name is UnknownCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
  3. Metropolitan Railroad v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1893
  4. Connor v. Washington Railway & Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1915
  5. Virginia Public Service Co. v. SilverCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1934

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. JeantyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Warner v. Capital Transit CompanyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1958
  3. Bray v. D. C. Transit System, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1962
  4. Nieman v. JacobsArizona Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Nieman v. JacobsArizona Supreme Court · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API