Advanced Medical Technologies, Inc. v. Shalala
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SIMANDLE, District Judge.
I. Background
Plaintiffs in these two related cases have petitioned for a preliminary injunction against defendants, the parties responsible for the administration of the Medicare laws. Plaintiffs claim that defendants have engaged in improper practices, resulting in the denial of payment to plaintiffs for the provision of medical supplies to Medicare beneficiaries.
The plaintiffs in these two related cases are Advanced Medical Technology, Inc. and Jem Tech Health Services, Inc. (in Civil Action 96-5473), and Health System Care, Inc. (in Civil Action 96-5474)…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Bowen v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Heckler v. RingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Coit Independence Joint Venture v. Federal Savings & Loan InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Courtney v. ChoplinDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2002