Sullivan v. Zeiner
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Haynes, C.
Defendant demurred to plaintiff’s complaint, the demurrer was sustained without leave to amend, judgment was thereupon entered for defendant, and plaintiff appeals therefrom.
The complaint alleges that plaintiff and defendant own adjoining lots in the city of San Francisco; that on plaintiff ’s lot there is a building, erected twenty years ago, along the line between the two lots; that defendant commenced an excavation on his lot for the purpose of building thereon, and excavated up to the line of and deeper than the foundation of plaintiff’s building, whereby it is left without the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gilmore v. DriscollMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
- Unger v. MooneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
- Thomas v. EnglandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Hanson v. McCueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
- Lakeside Ditch Co. v. CraneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Whiting v. GaylordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1895
- Hinkel v. CrowsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- San Francisco Credit Clearing House v. WellsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Puckett v. SullivanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Carty v. BlauthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.