Legal Opinion
Bacchus v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided April 30, 2009No. 06-CM-1263PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOSEY-HERRING, Associate Judge:
Following a bench trial, appellant Nathaniel Bacchus was found guilty of simple assault, second-degree theft, and destroying property, but was acquitted of violating a civil protection order (“CPO”). An unlawful entry charge was dismissed prior to trial.
On appeal, appellant contends that the trial court erred: (1) by admitting other crimes evidence relating to a prior arrest on May 31, 2005; (2) by admitting the testimony of a government witness who was seen prior to trial reviewing the grand jury transcript of the complaining witness’ testimony; and (3) in…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Nathan L. Drew v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
- Hansford P. Miller v. Jackson AviromCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
- Johnson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- Thompson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- Thomas v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Riddick v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- Blaize v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- Harrison v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- Legette v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- Williams v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.