Smock v. Brantley
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Judge.
The trial judge ordered that denial of an immediate appeal would affect a substantial right of plaintiffs. This was tantamount to a certification that there was no just reason for delay, and we conclude accordingly that the appeal has been effectively certified and is therefore properly before us. N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1A-1, R. Civ. P. 54(b) (1983).
Plaintiffs admitted during oral argument that the evidence present in the record before us does not present any genuine issue of material fact as to their allegations of corporate negligence by defendant Hospital. We agree. Nor is the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Dickens v. PuryearSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- Nasco Equipment Co. v. MasonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Willoughby v. KENNETH W. WILKINS, MD, PACourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
- Smith v. . Duke UniversitySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- Rucker v. High Point Memorial Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Forbes v. Par Ten Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
- Olympic Products Co. v. Roof Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
- Hoffman v. Moore Regional Hospital, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
- Shumaker Ex Rel. Shumaker v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1988
- Outer Banks Contractors, Inc. v. Daniels & Daniels Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.