Legal Opinion
Ernest Infelice v. United States of America, United States of America v. Raymond J. Dulski
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided December 31, 1975No. 75-1454, 75-1675PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, Associate Justice.
These two cases raise one common question: Whether an indictment must be invalidated when the letter of authority from the Attorney General directing the “special attorney” to investigate and prosecute the case is too broad under 28 U.S.C. § 515(a), 1 resulting in the presence of an unauthorized person before the Grand Jury. In Dulski 2 the District Court held the letter of authority insufficient and dismissed the indictment; while in Infelice 3 the opposite conclusion was reached. We agree with the latter holding and, accordingly, affirm the decision in Infelice and…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Shushan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
- United States v. Amazon Industrial Chemical CorporationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1931
- In Re Grand Jury Subpoena of Alphonse PersicoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- United States v. RosenthalU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1903
- United States v. MorseDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1922
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. Frank Peter Balistrieri, Steve Disalvo, and Dennis Librizzi, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Martin Sklaroff, Reuben Goldstein, and Pearl Leppo, A/K/A Earl LeppoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. David K. MorrisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- In Re Sealed CaseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- United States v. David B. MorrisonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1976
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.