Legal Opinion
United States v. Morse
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 27, 1922PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAugustus N. Hand, District Judge
(after stating the facts as above). The right of Fletcher Dobyns to appear before the grand jury depends on (1) whether the designation as counsel which he received from the Attorney General was sufficiently specific; (2) whether, if sufficiently specific, his appointment was rendered invalid because he was acting as special counsel of the United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corporation, or of the United States Shipping Board, and was paid from the funds of the former, as the pleas allege. Fletcher Dobyns’ designation was made by the Attorney General under the Act of June 30, 1906…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. San Jacinto Tin Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
- United States v. StrangSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- McKinney v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912
- United States v. HeinzeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1910
- United States v. CobbanU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Montana · 1904
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- United States v. GarssonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1923
- United States v. Frank CostelloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
- United States v. Amazon Industrial Chemical CorporationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1931
- In Re Grand Jury Subpoena of Alphonse PersicoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- United States v. PrueittCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.