Legal Opinion

Harry J. Whelchel Co. v. King

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1980PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FONES, Justice.

The question in this State revenue case is whether the grain bins that plaintiff sells to farmers qualify for the one percent sales tax rate applicable to “farm equipment and machinery” as defined in T.C.A. § 67-3002(p).

The trial judge found in favor of taxpayer and the Commissioner’s appeal presents two issues, to wit: (1) whether the grain bins are used “directly and primarily” to produce agricultural products for sale, and (2) whether the grain bins become real property when erected or installed.

The statutory definition in effect for the taxable periods involved in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Union Bank & Trust Co. v. Fred W. Wolf Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Woods v. General Oils, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Memphis Housing Authority v. Memphis Steam Laundry-Cleaners, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Hickman v. BoothTennessee Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Tibbals Flooring Co. v. HuddlestonTennessee Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Hubbard v. Hardeman County BankCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1993
  3. Lindstrom v. HouzengaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  4. Magnavox Consumer Electronics v. KingTennessee Supreme Court · 1986
  5. In Re HammondUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1984

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API