Legal Opinion
Magnavox Consumer Electronics v. King
Tennessee Supreme Court
Decided February 24, 1986PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HERSCHEL P. FRANKS, Special Justice.
The principal issue presented by this appeal is whether payments made by plaintiff-lessee pursuant to a vehicle lease entered between plaintiff and the lessor in the State of Indiana are subject to use tax pursuant to T.C.A., § 67-6-210.1
On August 8, 1969, plaintiff entered an agreement with Fort Wayne Leasing Company, an Indiana corporation, leasing a fleet of trucks. The lease was executed in Indiana and plaintiff took possession of the *505trucks in that state. The agreement provided plaintiff would pay a fixed rental for each truck plus a fixed rate…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Chrysler Corporation v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1959
- Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co. v. NorbergSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1977
- Harry J. Whelchel Co. v. KingTennessee Supreme Court · 1980
- Woods v. M. J. Kelley Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1980
- Hickman v. BoothTennessee Supreme Court · 1914
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Penske Truck Leasing Co. v. HuddlestonTennessee Supreme Court · 1990
- Itel Containers International Corp. v. CardwellTennessee Supreme Court · 1991
- Robert Keenan, Sr. v. Barry C. FodorCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2012
- Tomkats Catering, Inc. v. Ruth E. Johnson, Commissioner of Revenue, State of TNCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001