Legal Opinion

Goldman v. Leeann Builders Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 9, 1950PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtF. E. Johnson, J.

Plaintiffs move for summary judgment on an unpaid balance of a demand note.

The great mass of decisions which, almost summarily, deny motions under rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice poses the question whether the purpose and value of the rule has not been minimized by a timid approach to the claimed question of fact, or without examining the realities of the alleged conflict of fact — which conflict was said to really exist when the motion was denied. The fear of depriving a defendant of his day in court merely because he says, in-his affidavit, things that, if true, would present a…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Curry v. MacKenzieNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
  2. General Investment Co. v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1923
  3. Barrett v. JacobsNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  4. Dwan v. MassareneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  5. Camp-of-the-Pines, Inc. v. New York Times Co.New York Supreme Court · 1945

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Diamond v. WassermanNew York Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Lawson v. American Motors, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API