Legal Opinion
Diamond v. Wasserman
New York Supreme Court
Decided August 8, 1958PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtLotus L. Friedman, J.
The defendant Alexander Wasserman moves for summary judgment dismissing the complaint of the plaintiff as against him.
*782The plaintiff, Samuel A. Diamond (hereinafter referred to as husband), instituted this action against the said Alexander Wasserman and Rose Diamond, wife of the plaintiff (hereinafter referred to as wife), for a declaratory judgment, declaring that plaintiff is the owner in fee of a certain one-family house located on East 5th Street in Brooklyn, New York, and further prays in said action that the transfer of title to the said property, heretofore made by the said wife to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Curry v. MacKenzieNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Rubin v. Irving Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1953
- Brown v. . VolkeningNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
- Pope v. . AllenNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Holland v. . BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Diamond v. WassermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959