Legal Opinion

Palmer v. . Latham

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 28, 1917PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by plaintiffs from Bond, J., at January (Special) Term, 1917, of Lee.

1Opinion of the Court

OlaRK, O. J.

Tbe only question presented is tbe validity of a sale of land at tbe courthouse door in Moore County under a mortgage which provided that in ease of default it should be sold “at the court house door in Moore.” At the time the mortgage was executed (in 1906) the land lay in Moore County, but prior to' the time of sale (in 1915) it bad been placed in tbe new county of Lee. There is no allegation of bad faith, the sole contention of plaintiff being that the land should have been advertised and sold 'at the courthouse door in Lee.

In McIver v. Smith, 118 N. C., 73, the Court held.that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cawfield v. Owens.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1901
  2. White v. MalcolmCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1860
  3. McIver v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  4. Wortham v. . BasketSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
  5. Shaffer v. . BledsoeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hogan v. . UtterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  2. State Bank of Elberta v. PetersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  3. In Re the Foreclosure of a Deed of Trust Executed by BigelowCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API