Legal Opinion

State Bank of Elberta v. Peterson

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 22, 1932No. 1 Div. 747PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.

The mortgage here under consideration was executed in April, 1922, and the power of sale was perfonned in March, 1932. The l>ower of sale did not specify the place where the sale must be had, but .did provide that thirty days' notice should be given and that the sale should be for cash at public outcry, and that the mortgagee might bid at the sale. There is no claim of irregularity, except that the sale was conducted before the post office at Elberta, in Baldwin county, where the land is situated, pursuant to the notice, but not before the courthouse door of the county, which we judicially…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. W. C. Belcher Land Mortgage Co. v. TaylorTexas Commission of Appeals · 1919
  2. Jackson v. TribbleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
  3. Cowley v. ShieldsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  4. Brown v. LoebSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  5. Jordan v. SumnersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Lee v. MacOn County BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  2. First Nat. Bank of Opp v. BolesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  3. Appelbaum v. First Nat. Bank of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  4. Wilson v. Federal Land Bank of New OrleansSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  5. First Nat. Bank of Opp v. WiseSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API