Legal Opinion

Shaffer v. . Bledsoe

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1896PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Civil aotioN, for the recovery of land, tried before Ool)le, J., and a jury, at October Term, 1895, of Waice Superior Court. There was a verdict for the plaintiff, and from the judgment thereon defendants appealed. The facts appear in the opinion of Associate Justice MoNtgomery.

1Opinion of the Court

Montgomery, J.:

This action was brought by the plaintiff against the defendants Moses A. Bledsoe and Donna M. Bledsoe, his ivife, for the possession of certain lots of land situated in the city of Raleigh. The plaintiff claims title to the property under a deed executed to her by the sheriff of Waice county by virtue of a sale under two executions, one in favor of the Raleigh National Bank and the other in favor of O. H. Belvin, both against Moses A. Bledsoe, issued to him from the superior court of Wjake county. The answer makes a general denial of the plaintiff’s right to recover. The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Burton v. . Spiers and ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
  2. Dula v. . SeagleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
  3. McKee v. . LinebergerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
  4. Lee v. . BishopSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hogan v. . UtterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  2. Palmer v. . LathamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  3. Turner v. McKeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  4. Turner v. . McKeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API